Mass protest is back in fashion. Since 9/11, really, the idea that the people can influence the politicians by visibly banding together has had a new vogue. It’s been done before – in the 60s, in colonial India , in all kinds of places and times. These days, the internet, smart phones and social media have made it ever more possible to arrange flash mobs, sit-ins and marches. When these gatherings appear to be spontaneous, they’re hard to predict, prevent or police. It’s a kind of peaceful offensive by the masses against the officially empowered few – which makes it mildly ironic how often it’s used to protest against war.
Generally, every time mass protest makes a difference, or even makes the news, it inspires others to revisit the tactic for their own agendas. The Occupy movement, anti-bank and anti-greed, started in Spain , was inspired by the Arab Spring, which protested against tyrannical government.
Seems like these two aims have nothing in common – except that the behaviour of the mega-rich and the biggest banks borders on despotic, and the West’s governments seem powerless to discipline them even if they wanted to (which, it appears, they really don’t).
Mass protest works by sheer force of numbers – the general populace always outnumber the elite (whether that word is currently describing the rulers or the rich), it’s part of the definition of elite. And the elites know, on some level, that they are ultimately just as human as the masses, so when the hoi polloi rise up against them, they can either choose to surf the wave of public opinion or be drowned by it.
Occupy has been largely dismantled now, but that doesn’t mean the 1% has won. Just that the protest’s on hiatus – until next time.